- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:42:18 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Dear all, I would like to bring the group's attention to the new section "Compliance with this document". http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/diff-n.html#compliance-with-this-document Feedback welcome, Luc On 10/16/2012 12:40 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > > Hi Ivan, > > Find below a response to your comments. > > Changes brought to the document appear in: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/diff-n.html > > I am now closing this issue, pending your review. > > > On 09/10/2012 09:28 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/496 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: prov-n >> >> >> >> Original email: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Aug/0005.html >> >> >> Really just minor issues I found: >> >> - Wouldn't it be nice (and I know this is a pain in the back side to >> implement) to have references from the grammar to the corresponding >> entry in prov-dm? > > > Yes, this was added for each term, in each table following a > production (note > the new link is not highlighted in the html diff). > >> >> - I do not see an obvious place where the grammar can be downloaded >> as one piece (maybe I just missed it). I think it is important to >> provide this if implementers want to have their own parser… > > There is now a separate file. Of course that brings the question of > which definition is normative. > I have added a new section for this (see next email). > >> - 3.4.7, Namespace declaration: >> >> - minor buglet: in the bulleted item either both lines should >> begin with capital 'T' or none of the two >> - I do not understand this sentence: >> "the scope of a namespace declaration directly occurring in a >> toplevel >> bundle is the toplevel bundle itself, except and >> namedBundle it may contain". >> I presume what it wants to say is that a namespace declaration >> in a named bundle has priority over the namespace declaration in the >> top level bundle and somehow the editing went wrong… > > I have fixed the typo and edited the scoping rule. Hopefully, this > clarifies this issue. > > Regards, > Luc > >> >> Ivan >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 11:42:47 UTC