- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:55:49 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim I think, like many others, that prov-dm should remain technology agnostic. If for the rdf mapping, you feel this resource type is useful, then the rdf team should show how it should be used to express a resource uri in prov-dm. Does it seem reasonable? Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 22 Nov 2011, at 17:42, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > since rdf:resource doesn't exist as a datatype, perhaps use dm:Resource or similar? > > -Tim
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 20:57:00 UTC