- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:16:12 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul, Given the current document, is this issue still relevant? If yes, are we referring to isDerivedFrom? Which time (more precisely event) do you have in mind? use event? generation event? associated process start event, associated process end event? potentially a combination of all the above? Luc On 23/07/11 16:46, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/43 > > Raised by: Paul Groth > On product: Conceptual Model > > Other relationships have time associated with them (e.g. use, generation, control) > > There is no optional time associated with derivation. > > Suggested resolution is to add the following to the definition of isDerivedFrom: > > - May contain a "derived from time" t, the time or time intervals when b1 was derived from b2 > > Example: > isDerivedFrom(b1,b2, t) > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:16:48 UTC