- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:30:29 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim, I don't think there has been suggestion that the location attribute applies to other classes. You are making a good case for usage and generation. What else? Everything? Note sure this works for Quotation, OriginalSource, Attribution, Association, Responsibility .... Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 10 Apr 2012, at 22:58, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/342 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > 4.7.4.2 prov:location > > states: > > "The attribute prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity. " > > does this imply that it is NOT an attribute of any other class? > > I imagine that it might be useful to specify the location of a usage, which would be more specific than the location of the using activity. e.g., "The party happened at Sarah's. The cake was cut with a knife in the kitchen." To mention "kitchen" for the usage, prov:location seems natural. > > Is it acceptable to view the DM's current statement as non-restrictive? > > Thanks, > Tim > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 04:31:20 UTC