- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:45:52 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Protege did not handle the namespace change. Another tweak to change the namespace: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/5591d31fdc03 -Tim On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > prov-o team, > > Until http://prefix.cc/prov reflects the new namespace (http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#), > I am changing the ontology namespace back to the older (http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/) > > The change is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/21c0e3a378af > > Regards, > Tim > > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 1:37 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> ISSUE-224 for reference. >> >> -Tim >> >> >> >> On Feb 24, 2012, at 1:34 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> >>> Hi Tim, >>> >>> Related to this is sharing the prov namespace for all the specifications. >>> There is a separate issue on the tracker. >>> We don't know yet how to do it, so I think it's too premature to close. >>> >>> Professor Luc Moreau >>> Electronics and Computer Science >>> University of Southampton >>> Southampton SO17 1BJ >>> United Kingdom >>> >>> On 24 Feb 2012, at 06:31, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> namespace changed. >>>> >>>> pending review due to no objections. >>>> >>>> Chairs, please let me know if it's premature to close. >>>> >>>> -Tim >>>> >>>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> #g >>>>> >>>>> On 20/02/2012 20:30, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/256 >>>>>> >>>>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>>>>> On product: >>>>>> >>>>>> from >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ >>>>>> to >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# >>>>>> >>>>>> based on discussions at F2F and to align naming patterns used in other recent W3C namespaces (e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#, http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:46:22 UTC