- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:52:16 +0200
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, I am a bit wondering regarding the result-format URI erratum (item 2 in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#errata): A quick "googling" for http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results# seems to reveal that this URI has some substantial usage... Is there any way we can allow both http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results# and http://www.w3.org/2007/sparql-results# or any other idea how we can tackle existing usage of the 2005 namespace? Opinions? Axel On 27 Jul 2011, at 09:38, Axel Polleres wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > In the last TC (Action-503,ACTION-504) we had a discussion about the "Errata" for the XML Result format. > > As far as I understand the process [1], we mostly need to just incorporate the relevant points from > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQL_Errata#SPARQL_XML_Results > into > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/XMLres-errata > and then approve the Errata changes in the group, to be published. > > However, there's a small tricky part here: > > In fact, one of the Errata affects the published schema files: > Can we just change those in-place? i.e., can we overwrite some (non-spec) files in the rec space? > > Thanks for clarification, > > Axel > > p.s.: this completes ACTION-503. > > 1. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#errata
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 07:53:17 UTC