- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:47:57 -0400
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: public-rdfa-wg <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Looks good to me. Gregg On Mar 22, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm catching up on my ACTION-113 [1] to add the test cases needed to > cover the resolution of ISSUE-131 [2]. > > 1. The first part should be straightforward. I'll just add: > > <a href="http://example.org/" property="rdf:value" > content="value">ignored</a> > > Which results in (as it always has): > > <http://example.org/> rdf:value "value" . > > 2. The other part is the spec fix for when @datatype is present. I'd > like to verify that I'm reading things correctly. I figure that this: > > <a href="http://example.org/" property="rdf:value" datatype="">value</a> > > Should now also result in: > > <http://example.org/> rdf:value "value" . > > (Before the fix, the result was that @href was used for both subject > and object.) > > 3. For completeness, I should also add a test to verify that @about > effectively overrides @href here. I.e.: > > <a about="http://example.net/" href="http://example.org/" > property="rdf:value" content="value">ignored</a> > > Should become: > > <http://example.net/> rdf:value "value" . > > I also figure that this results in <http://example.net/> being used as > the parent resource for nested statements, correct? Thus, I should > probably extend this to be: > > <a about="http://example.net/" href="http://example.org/" > property="rdf:value" content="value one"> > <span property="rdf:value">value two</span> > </a> > > Yielding: > > <http://example.net/> rdf:value "value one", "value two" . > > If you all agree that I'm interpreting this correctly, I'll promptly > add these test cases and include them in the manifest. > > (To pass them I had to amend clj-rdfa. Fairly simple, but not yet > committed as I want this confirmed first.) > > Best regards, > Niklas > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/actions/113 > [2]: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/131 >
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 16:48:55 UTC