- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:47:56 +0000
- To: "7raivis@inbox.lv" <7raivis@inbox.lv>
- CC: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "jlebar@mozilla.com" <jlebar@mozilla.com>
On Aug 21, 2013, at 11:38 PM, 7raivis@inbox.lv wrote:
> Vibration API strength proposal with stair-stepping/smooth volume reduce/increase:
[...]
> or the same in simplified version without strings:
>
> navigator.vibrate([{200, [0, 80]}, {1000, 50, [0, 100, 0]}, {200, [50]}]);
>
> and single 1 s vibrate with 100 strength and without delay:
>
> navigator.vibrate({1000});
Thanks for your proposal.
All - I'd like to hear if the group and implementers think we should try fit this (or something similar) in v1, or if this feature would be a better candidate for a v2 spec instead as suggested by Marcos [1]?
Personally I think we may want to ship v1 first as is, gain more implementation experience, get more feedback from developers, and defer this feature to v2.
I added a pointer to this proposal to the group's Future Work wiki [2] so we don't forget.
Tracker, this relates to ISSUE-146.
Thanks,
-Anssi
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Aug/0062.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/FutureWork
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 13:48:30 UTC