- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:34:15 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Nov 24, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > > > On 23/11/2011 15:42, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/166 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html >> >> "sufficient should be returned to enable a client application to walk the provenance graph" >> >> Some noun is missing after "sufficient" > > I read that as an implicit reference to the "provenance information" in the preceding clause. > > E.g. "I shall bring you some milk if we have sufficient at home". > > Does this create a problem of understanding, or is it a stylistic thing? I did not raise it as a stylistic thing. I created the issue because this American English speaker had troubles understanding it. Would you object to "sufficient portions should be returned "? If it stands as is, I will not object. Regards, Tim
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 00:38:36 UTC