shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2017-01-17 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2017)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:36:36 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1cTIhQ-000Aq3-3v@maia.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/218

Raised by: Holger Knublauch
On product: SHACL - SPARQL

Hi Dimitris,

I believe you were the main proponent of the injection mechanism for annotation properties into validation results (sh:annotationProperty etc).

Given the time line and complexity (e.g. the issue with mapping variable names to properties) I would suggest to remove them from the standardization track. They could be added into the WG note. Nothing depends on them.

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 01:36:42 UTC