- From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:12:45 +0000
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
w3process-ISSUE-152 (Regress Editorial Change): Process2014 Regresses Editorial Revision of RECs [Process Document] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152 Raised by: Steve Zilles On product: Process Document In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Oct/0143.html Fantasia notes: In the 2005 Process,Editorial changes could be made to a REC by merely republishing it (as REC). In the 2014 Process, editorial changes require cycling through PR. The Process 2014 text is: [[[ Editorial changes to a Recommendation require no technical review of the proposed changes. A Working Group may request publication of a Proposed Recommendation or W3C may publish a Proposed Recommendation to make this class of change without passing through earlier maturity levels. Such publications are may be called a Proposed Edited Recommendation. ]]] Since I don't see any reason to make this more complicated than it was in the 2005 Process, I would like to see this change reverted.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 00:12:46 UTC