w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)] from Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker on 2014-04-23 (public-w3process@w3.org from April 2014)

From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:57:22 +0000
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1WczY2-0004YQ-Ok@stuart.w3.org>

w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/95

Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

It is not entirely clear exactly what you have to do to produce an Edited Rec. The idea is that if you don't need a technical review (editorial changes only), you can go straight to Proposed Rec.
If you made any substantive change you need a Candidate recommendation review, because there is no other guarantee that you didn't in fact touch on new IPR.

There should be a flow diagram here to clarify.

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 15:57:23 UTC