- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:31:51 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/39 Raised by: Richard Cyganiak On product: Dan Brickley said [1]: “Would be nice in 2011+ if the URIs for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-synax-ns and nearby were a bit more human-friendly (RDFa? conneg?) and were around 2 clicks away from a community wiki...” Ideally, the rdf: and rdfs: namespace would resolve to a nice content-negotiated resource with RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples, RDF/JSON and HTML+RDFa variants and versioning. See [2], [3] and [4] for some guidance and implementations. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0258.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/ [4] http://neologism.deri.ie/
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2011 15:31:53 UTC