- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:12:30 -0700
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Aug 4, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@gmail.com> wrote: >> ========= Introduction ========= >> >> This issue has been previously covered here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/9 >> >> I believe the example used does not highlight the importance of such a feature. > [snip] >> ========= Conclusion ========= >> >> - Without background-position-[x|y], there is a lot more code and more >> room for error. >> - State positions cannot be separated from type/subject positions. >> - Code is significantly larger to replace this feature. > > Hi! Thanks for emailing the list! > > As you indicated, this has been discussed before, and rejected. I > believe the reasoning for it being rejected is still valid. I think animation might be a good reason to reconsider. It seems like it would be useful to animate the background in two different directions independently of each other.
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:13:10 UTC