- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:25:36 +1000
- To: Marc Schroeder <marc.schroeder@dfki.de>
- Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org, w3c-mmi-wg <w3c-mmi-wg@w3.org>
On 1 Jun 2011, at 16:49, Marc Schroeder wrote: > - within-document definition of a vocabulary; I would look at SKOS Concept Schemes [1] (note, you don't have to use all of SKOS, just the bits that work for you...) > - structure encouraging use of a vocabulary only for the intended purpose; Typing. Each SKOS Concept Scheme can be typed (eg as a Category vocab, or as a Dimension vocab etc...) > - automatic verifiability whether a term is within the identified vocabulary; Easy with SKOS - all the terms are right there... > - as little added complexity as possible. We all wish for this....;-) But your current Vocab System introduces new elements/attributes (eg <vocabulary>, <item>..) - all you are doing is using a couple of <skos> elements instead....and opening up your world ! Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secscheme
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 13:26:20 UTC