- From: Bob Regan <bregan@macromedia.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:06:09 -0700
- To: "List \(WAI-AUWG\)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Perhaps 2.1 could be a success criteria of 3.1? Cheers, Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - bob regan | macromedia | 415.832.5305 -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jan Richards Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:50 PM To: List (WAI-AUWG) Subject: Overlapping success criteria in ATAG These two success criteria appear to be the same: A.2.1 Ensure that all functionality is operable via a keyboard or a keyboard interface. [Priority 1] - Follow accessibility conventions for keyboard control. AND A.3.1 Observe the accessibility conventions of the platform. [Priority 2] - Keyboard accessibility configuration conventions (e.g. default accelerator key bindings) for the current platform (specified in the conformance profile) must be followed. Since the A.3.1 one is more specific maybe we should remove the A.2.1 one? Cheers, Jan
Received on Friday, 30 September 2005 22:06:40 UTC