RE: "Request for response to original XML Core WG comments"

Hello Paul,

Thanks much for your comments!

The EXI Working Group responded publicly to the XML Core comments in January of last year [1].  But as you noted, the group has indeed taken further action since then to address their comments.  We are working on an update to our original response to clarify the group's actions/resolutions (including any changes made to the EXI specification) to address the comments from XML Core.  We expect to post the update within the next couple of weeks.

Thanks again,

Mike Cokus (for the EXI Working Group)
  
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-exi/2008Jan/0003.html

Mike Cokus
The MITRE Corporation
757-896-8553; 757-826-8316 (fax)
903 Enterprise Parkway
Hampton, VA 23666

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-exi-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-exi-comments-
>request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Pierce
>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:56 PM
>To: EXI Comments
>Subject: "Request for response to original XML Core WG comments"
>
>These original comments on the first draft were acknowleged but never
>publicly responded to as far as I can tell, so I'm incorporating them
>here in the comments list by reference:
>
>XML Core WG review of Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0, draft
>of 2007-07-16
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-exi/2007Oct/0005.html
>
>I know the EXI WG discussed these long ago and incorporated a few into
>the spec, but these comments are very important and must have a
>substantial public response.
>
>In my opinion comments 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 must be more carefully considered
>for inclusion; 2 and 8 as mandatory rather than options.
>
>Paul Pierce

Received on Sunday, 15 March 2009 21:21:36 UTC