Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 18:40, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote:
> None of these require OWL-Full, and are well within DL. I haven't had
> trouble reasoning over these sorts of restrictions with data in place.

Well, we can keep it in DL if that still does the job, I just meant
that there would be no OWL profile restrictions on forming those
rules, and that it should be possible to 'retrofit' them like that.

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester

Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 13:57:21 UTC