- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:30:34 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 05:53, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > I'm open to name suggestions for the domain of hadTemporalExtent (currently, Durable). > Activities are a subclass of Durable. Perhaps "durable" is strange name, as it sounds like it will last a while, like a good pair of shoes. What seems to come out of this organization is a hint that any prov:InstantaneousEvent (DM term, so I guess OK for now) like End, Start, Generation, can be linked with a prov:TimeInstant. prov:Durable's like prov:Activity (and no other? prov:Entity possibly?) could be linked with prov:TimeInterval - that is they have a start and end. prov:occuredDuring does not quite reflect this - it just says that the activity at least happened/lived during that interval - but could have lasted longer. prov:hadTemporalExtent is still in the ontology with an empty domain - when to use hadTemporalExtent vs occuredAt? prov:startedAt, prov:EndedAt are not related to the other time properties. http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF does not seem to reflect these new properties/classes. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 13:31:26 UTC