Re: Acid3 and :first-child

This changed 3 years ago? And nobody implemented it in 3 years? While
everyone had the opposite implemented?

Isn't this a pretty clear sign that this change was wrong?

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:12 PM Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com> wrote:

> As Ms2ger said, :first-child now matches elements without a parent
> (technically, it matches elements without a parent and without a
> previousElementSibling).
> <https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/317> is the issue that
> led to the change, which was
> <
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/d57fda06a4f0aebb598e3341a2153bd958c171bc
> >.
> It seems to originate in feedback from bz, wondering why it doesn't
> apply.
>
> /g
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> > Wow. What was the change, and why?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:47 AM Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Hixie,
> >>
> >> There seems to have been a spec change on :first-child for elements
> >> without a parent. Gecko implemented and started failing Acid3 test 35
> >> (see <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311329>).
> >>
> >> Could you update / disable the test?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Ms2ger
> >>
> >
>