Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

>
>
> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> +1


> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event,
> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> +1 (the PROV-O team is considering to relabel prov:QualifiedInvolvement as
prov:Event)


> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> +1 for Derivation, Association, Activity Ordering (others seem to be
specialization of these relationships)


> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
>  0 (under discussion)


> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse
>             This includes Account Record.
>
>  -1 (Records as constructs for aggregating provenance assertions are
needed - ProvenanceContainer or Account?)


> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
>   Note
>
> +1


> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse
>
> 0


> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of
> discourse.
>
> 0


> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.
>
>
> 0


Best,
Satya


>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>