- From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:07:16 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOHhXmS5oAjJJKOicXA-X09tqAJU6VK_+wguuLopsgRQLJPBXA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Antoine, On 14 April 2016 at 05:54, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Riccardo, > > Belated reaction... > > The description of wasDerivedFrom is good. I mean, I personally don't like > it, but this is the one in PROV... > Do ou think it's possible to add a link to the example for wasDerivedFrom > [3] in one of the notes, or in an extra note, or as a sentence next to the > table? > I have added a sentence. > > About transforming the note after dqv:qualityAssessment into a usage note. > I'm ok with this in theory. But the problem is that it's less visible. I > feel that if we do this we should create a new (sub-)section about > extending motivations. Or add a new Note after the qualityAssessment table, > saying that in the future DQV should have one such (sub-)section. Ok .. I am going to leave it as it is at least for the moment. Cheers, Riccardo > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > [3] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#expressQualityDerivation > > On 23/03/16 06:54, Riccardo Albertoni wrote: > >> I am closing action 225 then :) >> >> I have added the wasDerivedForm as Property in the Vocabulary >> specification[1]. >> Any suggestions/modifications on the new property description? >> Moreover, writing down the usage note of wasDerivedFrom, I've realized >> that the note placed below the quality assessment instance (resulting >> from ACTION-256 [2]) could be more coherently turned into a usage note. >> can we make this transformation? >> >> cheers, >> Riccardo >> >> [1]http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#prov:wasDerivedFrom >> >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/256 >> >> On 23 March 2016 at 08:14, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto: >> aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote: >> >> Hi Riccardo, >> >> Thanks a lot! >> I've cross-checked this, and it's perfect for me. >> >> Re "Should prov:wasDerivedFrom be added also as property in the >> vocabulary documentation" >> If it's an important property (and I think it is) then I think it >> should be added in the documentation. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> On 3/22/16 7:01 AM, Riccardo Albertoni wrote: >> >> Dear Antoine and all, >> I have introduced the property prov:wasDerivedFrom in the section >> vocabulary overview [1] >> and I've created the example required from this action [2]. >> >> Therefore, If there are not comments, the action-225 can be >> closed. >> >> A question: >> Should prov:wasDerivedFrom be added also as property in the >> vocabulary documentation (section 4)? or would we like to stick to the rule >> " we won't provide descriptions of properties and classes defined in third >> party vocabulary? >> >> Cheers, >> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#model >> [2] >> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#expressQualityDerivation >> >> On 14 March 2016 at 16:39, Data on the Web Best Practices Working >> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto: >> sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org> <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto: >> sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org>>> wrote: >> >> dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom >> in the dqv, close issue-222 >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/255 >> >> Assigned to: Riccardo Albertoni >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is >> believed to be clean. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Riccardo Albertoni >> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche >> "Enrico Magenes" >> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche >> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA >> tel. +39-010-6475624 <tel:%2B39-010-6475624> - fax >> +39-010-6475660 <tel:%2B39-010-6475660> >> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto: >> Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> <mailto: >> Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto: >> Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>> >> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni >> www: _http://www.imati.cnr.it/_ >> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni >> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Riccardo Albertoni >> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico >> Magenes" >> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche >> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA >> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 >> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto: >> Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> >> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni >> www: _http://www.imati.cnr.it/_ >> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni >> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf >> > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riccardo Albertoni Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>* http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 10:07:46 UTC