Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does?

Just to be more precise, this concerns the path expressions [1]. There
are already slashes being used there.

So I guess Sandro's proposal is to make LD path expressions *look
like* SPARQL property paths.

But unlike SPARQL, LD path expressions can be nested, and include
constraints. SPARQL does that with FILTER and new constraints in the
BGP. The grouping in SPARQL (using parenthesis) is very different from
the constraints (square brackets and exclamation mark).

I think it's a bad idea to make them feel like they behave the same,
which could be induced by the choice of the syntax.

I don't want to stop the group with syntactical questions thought, so
just a -0.9 for me.

Alexandre

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html#path-expression

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Linked Data Platform  Working Group
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/100
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 15:18:29 UTC