Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-09-06 meeting 1600 UTC

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:

>
>
> All,
>
> Please find below the agenda for our today's conference call.
>
>
> Cheers,
>        Michael
>
>
> ------------------------------**---------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-09-06
> ------------------------------**----------------------------
> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/**worldclock/fixedtime.html?**
> month=09&day=06&year=2011&**hour=16&min=00&sec=0<http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=09&day=06&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0>
>
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> ------------------------------**---------------------------
>
>
> Chair: Michael
> Scribe: Michael
>
>
>
> 1. Admin
>
> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-
> **rdb2rdf-minutes.html <http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html>with the correction by David in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
> 2011Aug/0185.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0185.html>
>
>
> 2. R2RML
>
> ISSUE-61 PENDING REVIEW see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**
> Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**2011Aug/0133.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0133.html>
>
> ACTION-147 on Richard re ISSUE-29:
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-29; all places that interpret SQL values as string
> now use "conversion to string"
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/*
> *rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-**conversions<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions>
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-51; the spec now demands that “supported RDF
> types” MUST raise data error, and other types MAY raise data error
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Lack of consensus on the syntax question is noted in the
> issue box in Section 4.2, which presents both options. A decision on
> the question will be postponed until after Last Call. This closes
> ISSUE-57.
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUES 54, 56, 59, 60; they are addressed in the
> latest draft.
> ]]
>
> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
> 2011Aug/0150.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0150.html>for details re  ISSUES 54, 56, 59, and 60.
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and can
> be addressed after Last Call
> ]]
>
>
> 3. DM
>
> ISSUE-65 ... do we have a PROPOSAL for this, now?
>

[[
PROPOSAL: For a foreign key of any arity, the reference property IRI is of
the form <Table#ref-attr1-attr2-...-attrn>. This will address ISSUE-65
]]

>
>
> 4. AOB
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
>
>