Re: [All] Update AGENDA MLW-LT 2012-08-30

FYI again: irc is

http://irc.w3.org
channel #mlw-lt

- Felix

2012/8/30 Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>

> Changes:
>
> - update of action items
>
> - added topic "call time"
>
>
>
> See your time at
>
>
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120830T14
>
>
>
> DIAL-IN INFORMATION
>
>
>
> 1. Please join my meeting.
>
>
>
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/682416317
>
>
>
> 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> Or, call in using your telephone.
>
>
>
> Spain: +34 911 23 4170
>
>
>
> France: +33 (0) 182 880 932
>
>
>
> Germany: +49 (0) 811 8899 6930
>
>
>
> Ireland: +353 (0) 19 036 185
>
>
>
> United States: +1 (626) 521-0015
>
>
>
> Access Code: 682-416-317
>
>
>
> Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
>
>
>
> Meeting ID: 682-416-317
>
>
>
> ACTIONS (3 min)
>
> I closed action-34, Seattle event, for David.
>
> action-162: Pedro, do you have something for us to look at already?. No
> update today, Pedro will discuss this next week.
>
> action-164. RDF Ontology: who is going to create and maintain the
> ontology? Maxime?
>
> action-179 Work with Olaf-Michael to help draft blurb for international
> organizations. Is this moving forward or should we drop it?
>
> action-196 inheritance in the spec done, see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Aug/0311.html
>
>
> PRAGUE + TPAC (2 min)
>
> Can you please indicate your attendance for Prague at
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/PragueSep2012#Participants
>
> and for TPAC at
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2012/?login
>
> Attendance for LT-Web partners is required in both meetings; for TPAC,
> please attend at least 1-2 November. Participation in the technical plenary
> day 31 October is highly recommended for networking beyond MLW-LT :)
>
>
>
> ISSUES
>
> ISSUE-22 Provenance (5 min). Goal: get an update from Dave: when will a
> new draft will be available? What issues need to be resolved? Who is
> implementing?
>
> ISSUE-33 Test suite design (10 min). Goal: get feedback on
> http://phaedrus.scss.tcd.ie/its2.0/its-testsuite.html
> questions:
> - is the output format feasible for implementors?
> - the output format doesn't "do" anything with the data, e.g. translation,
> term processing, provenance processing etc. Is that enough?
> - who can contribute more detailed test cases?
> Update from Dave on ACTION-139 and ACTION-145.
> Action-180 (add HTML5 examples to the spec): I would like to resolve this
> by  linking to the HTML5 test suite examples. This doesn't work yet since
> the table at
> http://phaedrus.scss.tcd.ie/its2.0/its-testsuite.html
> doesn't have ID attributes, but Leroy is going to add these.
>
>  ISSUE-34 quality data category (5 min)
> See spec text
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#lqissue
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#lqprecis
> Goal: discuss open issues + find a reviewer who is *not* an expert in the
> quality area.
> action-168: Arle, any update on contacts to checkmate etc.?
> FYI, I closed action-192 "freeze the number of information items in
> quality".
>
> ISSUE-36 special requirements (5 min)
> See discussion on regex, latest mail at
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Aug/0309.html
> Goal: decide whether we can move forward with "forbidden characters". find
> a volunteer to edit / create spec text for "storage size". Assure
> implementation commitments.
>
> ISSUE-41 mtConfidence (5 min)
> Goal: find out whether David can move forward with Felix input on ISSUE-42
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Aug/0304.html
> Assure implementation commitments.
>
> ISSUE-44 editorial notes (2 min)
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/44
> Goal: find a volunteer to work on these.
>
> ISSUE-45 (3 min). HTML5 API for ITS. Probably not needed, but let's
> discuss the idea of an ITS JS library.
>
> SPEC REVIEW
> Related Action-186 (make HTML5 draft more reader friendly). I would like
> to drop action-186 and have this done by reviewers (see below).
>
> TIME LINE UNTIL PRAGUE
> - Data categories that still need quite some work
> See also
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments#Data_categories_2
> Disambiguation, provenance, quality issue, quality precise,
> textanalysisannotation, forbiddencharacters, storagesize, mtConfidence
> Have I missed something
>
> - Work on general quality of the draft. I have asked Dave, David, Aaron
> and Moritz to review the draft in general. That should give us plenty of
> feedback to work on.
> During the call, I would like to find volunteers to review data categories
> they have not worked on. Goal of this slot: create a lot of action items.
>
> *Important*: Now it is getting more important to check the quality of the
> draft than discussing details of unstable data categories. We will try to
> do all of the above data categories; but if time doesn't allow it, we will
> give precedence to the quality of the draft.
>
> TIME LINE BETWEEN PRAGUE AND LYON (TPAC)
>
> - Work on ITS in HTML5 issue. Bottom line: we cannot expect a free ticket
> from the HTML WG for all data categories as is. There might be a detailed
> review of our spec coming up. This closes my action-199.
>
> CALL TIME
> The current time doesn't work for everybody - let's discuss this briefly.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>



-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow