[All] AGENDA MLW-LT Call 28 June, 2 p.m. UTC

See your time at
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120628T14

We will try to go through actions and "low hanging fruit" issues fast with
the goal to close or at least update these. Then we will discuss RDF + ITS
and terminology related data categories (named entity and disambiguation)
in detail.

Note that not every action or issue is on the agenda - we just won't get to
talk about everything and need to bring topics up again next week.

ACTIONS
See open actions at
https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/open

- ACTION-135 Pedro to have Giuseppe to flesh out specialRequirements.
Pedro, can you give a timeline for this? If we don't get input by mid July,
we will need to drop specialRequirements.

- ACTION-126 David to come up with a proposal for mtConfidence. Please
don't forget, this is needed to move mtConfidence to the list of data
categories at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments
,
again by mid July.

- ACTION-107 Shaun - can you give an update on the "LocaleFilter" proposal
at http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20120626/#LocaleFilter
Using the template attached at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0133.html
? And taking this discussion
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0148.html
into account?
This would close ACTION-107 and contribute to ISSUE-10 "language vs.
locale". If you don't have time, who would volunteer?

- ACTION-141: Table in a staging wiki page to notify current state of all
data categories in terms of consensus and impl comitments. Maybe not needed
in a separate place if we add the information to
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments?
This should be update by the co-chairs only.

- ACTION-81 "consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and
translationAgent" - I closed this one, Dave, since I think we keep track of
this via the provenance section you will provide by mid July - let me know
if you disagree.

- General reminder: we need to move quality discussion forward by mid July,
otherwise the quality related data categories at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments
are
at risk to not be on the spec. See also ACTION-113 for this: Dave to
conclude quality discussion with Arle, including examples from existing
implementation in CMS-LION

- General reminder: our plan until September, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0133.html
Let the co-chairs know if you have questions.

DISCUSSIONS (SHORT, HOPEFULLY)

- Propose to close ISSUE-23 Re-draft section 7.6. "Removal, Archiving and
Re-integration of ITS mark-up"
see latest mail from Moritz at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0042.html

- Propose to close ISSUE-1: Low level API to access CMS content, since this
is implementation specific.

- Propose to close ISSUE-12 Create a (Sentence) Segmentation Markup System
compatible with the proposed Unicode segmentation characters; until we hear
from ULI. I also closed ACTION-105, this is not needed until we hear from
ULI. Arle, let me know if you think different.

- Propose to close "ISSUE-6: Process State" and re-open it after we have
reached ITS last call. See also the discussion at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0137.html
Opinions?

- Need a volunteer to work on ISSUE-9 id granularity and maintenance
requirements and rules and idValue data category proposal, or drop the
idValue data category proposal.

- ISSUE-13 Cache data category needed and how? Needs two implementations,
any volunteers in addition to Pedro? Otherwise we'll have to close this.

- ISSUE-16 parameter for rules - can be closed as is without any change -
opinions?

- ISSUE-24: Proposal to change ITS term. Propose to close this, not moving
forward and may be just a best practice for XLIFF+ITS. See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0076.html
question: is there a need for best practices about the relation between ITS
and XLIFF? That's something we could do in 2013.

DISCUSSIONS (DETAILED, HOPEFULLY)

- RDF serialization
related action: ACTION-122 Maxime to lead discussion on RDF serialization
in ITS, with "task force" people - Sebastian, Maxime, Dave, ...
Done via
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0127.html
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Y8yLjJpWTJFA-WTvRhTDd6zl6jBOE9P5ckTfCZqUZIk

- Terminology discussion at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0136.html
The separation between terminology, disambiguation and named entity is not
really moving forward. Nevertheless we need this in ITS 2.0.

Talk to you soon,

Felix

-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow