Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference 2013-12-19

Regrets. :/
On Dec 17, 2013 11:20 AM, "Olivier Thereaux" <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The Audio WG will hold its fortnightly teleconference on 19th December
> 2013.
>
> In your Timezone:
>         http://timeanddate.com/s/2hhx
> Logistics at:
>         http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Meetings#Telcon_Times
>
> Please send regrets if you know you won’t be able to attend. We will also
> need a volunteer to scribe. I’d rather someone come forward in advance than
> pick a victim at the beginning of the call.
>
> Proposed agenda lineup as follows:
>
> ** Agenda+ Review of action items
>
> The current lineup of action items to review is as follows:
>
> - ACTION-70 on Olivier Thereaux:
> Look into migrating all webaudio issues from bugzilla to github
> - ACTION-87 on Matthew Paradis:
> Review http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/webaudio, suggest updates
> - ACTION-88 on Matthew Paradis:
> Start discussion on audio-dev list about known best practices (and
> tutorials), make sure to include stuff linked in chrislowis' newsletter
> - ACTION-89 on Paul Adenot:
> Look at current implementations, and draft interface to request
> mathematical oscillator (issues/127) and specify phase (base on pr 270)
> - ACTION-91 on Chris Wilson:
> Do a quick review of HRT l2
> - ACTION-80 on Chris Wilson:
> Remove webaudio section on example applications, photos from section on
> convolution, and salvage anything valuable
> - ACTION-86 on Chris Lowis:
> Document the case of mediaelementaudiosource and mediastreamaudiosource
> nodes in offlineaudiocontext on github
>
>
> ** Agenda+ De-zippering (continued)
>
> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013OctDec/0329.html
>
>
> ** Agenda+ Data Races
>
> See
>  - https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/66 (AudioBuffer,
> assigned, needs PR)
>  - https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/268(AudioProcessingEvent, TBD, on ChrisW’s pile)
>  - https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/254 (The rest. There
> seems to be consensus. I want to assess that and move on)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless
> specifically stated.
> If you have received it in
> error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the
> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
> immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
> sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to
> this.
> -----------------------------
>
>