So, to be clear, the final version of the proposed wording is: This specification has no defined user interface. Consequently, there are no specific accessibility requirements on implementations. However, to the extent that an implementation provides user interactions to support this specification, the implementation must ensure that the interface is exposed to the platform accessibility API. Moreover, implementors should take into consideration the needs of their users with varying abilities when designing solutions that implement this specification. For example, the use of biometric authentication techniques should be varied enough to allow for people with widely differing physical abilities. On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > On 09/08/2016 14:12, Shane McCarron wrote: > >> Nice! Friendly amendment? I think that "widely differing physical >> abilities" is more poetic than "widely different physical abilities". >> What do you think? >> > +1 > > > Léonie. > > > -- > @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem > > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 16:42:44 UTC