Re: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative from Henri Sivonen on 2012-11-30 (public-html@w3.org from November 2012)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:27:35 +0200
To: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAJQvAufz5u5tKqWnjeK5GmBTyLng4H4ik_4BZh8GXJ6isGOaCg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> We still have Formal Objections which have not been withdrawn.  Are we to
> proceed within the working group or are we to forward this matter to the
> Director?

As Maciej said, the purpose of
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0006.html was
to serve as a way to go to a poll within the WG. My expectation is to
proceed to a poll within the WG. However, before doing so, it would be
interesting to see the TAG’s take on
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Nov/0047.html .

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 16:28:06 UTC