- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:00:52 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I don't think there are in properties in the dm itself that are defined as such... Paul On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > Before I take out all property characteristics in prov-o, should _any_ stay? > > e.g., should the properties stay asymmetric and irreflexive? > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > > On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/431 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: Ontology >> >> Need to remove the OWL properties that reflect the prov-constraints, since we are only reflecting prov-dm. >> >> >> >> > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 21:01:20 UTC