Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm]

Luc,

I would change/add:

- The feedback was broken down in individual issues that were addressed
separately on this page. The group thanks for the reviewer for the
extensive comments!
- The group made changes based on the reviewers feedback, please see each
issue for the relevant change.
- Make a section UML

cheers
Paul

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

>
> Dear all,
>
> Find our response to the overall feedback raised by Robert. It was broken
> down in issues that
> were handled individually.
>
> Luc
>
>
>  ISSUE-463 (Overall Feedback)
>
>    - Original email:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Jul/0010.html
>       - Zip file with UML diagrams:
>       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Jul/att-0010/PROV_Feedback.zip
>    - Tracker: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/463
>    - Group Response:
>       - The feedback was broken down in individual issues that were
>       addressed separately on this page.
>       - The UML diagrams in PROV-DM are informative. They are intended to
>       illustrate concepts as best as possible. The normative material is found in
>       the text. There may be alternative UML modelling of the same normative
>       definitions.
>       - Alternative UML diagrams were proposed by the author of this
>       feedback. Individual issues have addressed these points, but below we
>       provide specific feedback on some UML diagrams.
>          - Entities.png: Organization, Person, Software are not entities
>          (ISSUE-520), Bundles are not Collections (ISSUE-524), and membership is
>          expressed as a relation and not an attribute (ISSUE-529)
>          - Interactions.png: we did not find it suitable to introduce a
>          role (generatedEntity/UsedEntity) since then we would have to introduce a
>          different identifier for the entity in that role. This would result in very
>          convoluted graphs, with lots of 'acts as' relations. There is no
>          startTime/endTime for Invalidation, Usage, Generation, but simply a time. A
>          strong desire has been to facilitate the assertions of provenance: ex:a2
>          prov:used <uri> and <uri> wasGeneratedBy ex:a1
>          - Relations.png: Alternate/Specialization/Membership do not have
>          id and attributes. Adoption is not a PROV relation. PROV does not define
>          activity composition.
>        - References:
>    - Changes to the document:
>    - Original author's acknowledgement:
>
>
>
> On 07/25/2012 08:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/463
>
> Raised by: Paul Groth
> On product: prov-dm
>
> See email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Jul/0010.html
>
> This includes extensive uml diagrams as well as comments on role. See the attached Zip file for more info
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>


-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam