- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 13:48:39 +0200
- To: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
This seems good. Stian can you add it? Thanks Paul On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > On 03/05/2012 11:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> Don't you think the OWL should contain something like >> >> <> owl:versionIRI >> <www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120501/ProvenanceOntology.owl> ? > > Stian, yes, we should also have that! > > -- Jun > >> >> I would +1 that as people like myself will download the OWL locally >> for processing with say Sesame-Elmo, and it later will be important to >> know which one it is based on. >> >> We just need to know the magic date to add it in advance. >> >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jun Zhao<jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >>> Hi Tim, >>> >>> I am happy with what we will do with the public release. >>> >>> And dealing with versioning for internal releases can wait if you are >>> overwhelmed by other commitment at the moment. >>> >>> -- Jun >>> >>> >>> On 02/05/2012 00:27, Tim Lebo wrote: >>>> >>>> Jun, >>>> >>>> The prov.owl will be "copied" to the official w3c website directory when >>>> the WD2 is published on Thursday, so there will be no question about what >>>> OWL file the HTML is talking about. >>>> >>>> Hopefully, the "dereferencability problem" (which paul took on and we >>>> asked Daniel to help with) will be addressed soon, which will provide the >>>> latest OWL when requesting the terms' URIs. >>>> >>>> If we want to be explicit about what version of the ontology the HTML is >>>> taking about, I can look into exposing that within every compiled draft up >>>> to LC that is due in a few weeks. But generally, these are always in sync >>>> because the ontology changes less frequently and the HTML is generated much >>>> more frequently. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Please let me know which aspects you need most, so that we can address the >>>> right issues soon. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On May 1, 2012, at 11:38, Provenance Working Group Issue >>>> Tracker<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/371 >>>>> >>>>> Raised by: Jun Zhao >>>>> On product: PROV-O HTML >>>>> >>>>> Can we talk about when or whether we will have snapshots for our >>>>> ontology, like ProvenanceOntology-20120430.owl? Or achieve similar >>>>> functionality via other mechanisms? >>>>> >>>>> Because our ontology is still work in progress, it is important to have >>>>> the right ontology content associated with each prov-o spec public release >>>>> or even work draft. >>>>> >>>>> I think this would be something really nice to have at least for this >>>>> upcoming public release. >>>>> >>>>> I am happy to discuss more on this. >>>>> >>>>> -- Jun >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 11:49:09 UTC