- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:17:01 -0700
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi Graham, We had some requests from implementers to see if there was a way to allow for something like SOAP or other protocol to be used with the service description other than http. Note, I don't think we have to define it just say something about how this could be done. Yes, the focus is clearly http but the idea would be to leave the door open to such other protocols. Paul On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > Yes, if non-HTTP URIs are used. But the focus of this document was, from the > outset, intended to focus on using HTTP. > > To say more, I'd need to understand exactly what is being requested here. > > #g > -- > > On 23/06/2012 20:04, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/433 >> >> Raised by: >> On product: >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 11:17:37 UTC