- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:37:28 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc, We have attempted to address issues you raised in the revised editor's draft of prov-aq: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/prov-aq.html ISSUE-76 - Section 4 no longer has turtle examples https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/76 Can you check if the following issues that we have marked pending review can be closed: - https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/79 - https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/112 Finally, For ISSUE-233 (https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/233 ), we can now come back to this in-light of the revised service specification. I guess a discussion on the service specification should happen before returning to where or if accounts belong in that specification. Thanks Paul
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 14:38:01 UTC