- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:22:24 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I was wondering if they could be headers with actual names. Like 1) Extension of Starting Point Terms 2) Entities and Abstraction 3) Describing Entities Fruther 4) Entity Lifetimes 5) Activity Lifetimes It was just an idea that could help organized things. But I'm not picky :-) Paul On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > Paul, > > > On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > > … > >> >> ==3.2 Expanded Terms== >> - I wonder if the 5 categories should be more prominent > > > How do you suggest they become more prominent? > Why is the bold "first, second, third, fourth, fifth" in the corresponding paragraphs inadequate? > > Thanks, > Tim > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 15:22:56 UTC