Matthias, We also need ID cookies, but we need them for many reasons, including auditing frequency capping compliance and reporting on frequency, not just for detecting OOBC. By the way, I would not call the short retention a "permitted use"; it is a "permitted retention" only. No "use" of the data is granted by this section. --ronan On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: > Hi Ronan, > > Quick question: Do you only need a change in collection/retention time to > 48h > or would you also require to set a ID cookie? > (i.e., loosely speaking "acting like DNT;0" for 48h and then cleaning up)? > > In the latter case (also 48h permission to set cookies), I would need to > change the proposed text for this permitted use. > >
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 10:39:54 UTC