Re: ACTION-437: Make edit for for issue-70, see http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item05 , and go back to chase (MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group)

Hi Dave,

Apologies, I deleted this thread by accident and Kevin just pointed it out
to me.  The changes look good to me.

Thanks!
ct


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

>  Hi Guys,
> First, thanks Pablo for this revised example. I reworked the explanatory
> text a bit in the attached word file (using revision marks) to make it a
> bit more terse, but the actual code seems fine as it is.
>
> If one of the editors could add this to the draft, then we just need to
> see if Chase and Kevin are happy with this to close ISSUE-70.
>
> So Chase, Kevin, just to clarify, we've update the explanation of
> precedence at:
>  http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20<http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#selection-precedence>
> .html#selection-precedence<http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#selection-precedence>
> and at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#html5-selection-precedence
> as well as adding this attached revision to example 30 in section 8.1
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#datacategories-defaults-etc
>
> As David Filip mentioned to you in:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Mar/0189.html
> if you can indicate whether this satisfies you comment or not that would
> be a real help. If we don't hear back from you by the 9th April, we'll
> assume you are happy with this response. Many thanks for this important
> comment.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>
> On 26/03/2013 11:07, Pablo Nieto Caride wrote:
>
> Hi Felix, Yves, all,
>
> As promised, I reworked the example 30. I send attached the description on a docx and the XML file, please check whether it needs improvements or not. I hope it is not too tangled.
>
> Besides I checked sections 5.5 and 6.4 and in my opinion along with examples 23 and 8 they clarify things a lot.
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
>
>                                      Ok then, next Tuesday I'll deliver it!
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
>
>                                       Hi Felix,
>
> Yes, it looks good and it's very clear to me.
>
> I can do the rework of the example and the description if it's ok with you. Next Tuesday is fine or do you need it earlier?
>
>  Sure, take your time - thanks in advance, Pablo.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
>
>  Cheers,
> Pablo.
> Thanks for the feedback, Pablo and Yves. Do http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
> html#selection-precedence
> andhttp://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
> html#html5-selection-precedence
> look ok?
>
> I haven't reworkedhttp://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/examples/xml/EX-datacat-be
> havior-1.xml
> any volunteer?
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 21.03.13 16:49, schrieb Pablo Nieto Caride:
>
>  +1 Yes that would help too!
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
> Maybe re-working the example that illustrate the different overrides would help too.
>
> I don't think the one we have covers some of the cases where people get confused.
> Seehttp://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/examples/xml/EX-datacat-b
> e
> havior-1.xml
>
>
> -ys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pablo Nieto Caride [mailto:pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:27 AM
> To: 'Felix Sasaki'; 'MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group'
> Subject: RE: ACTION-437: Make edit for for issue-70, seehttp://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item05 , and go back
> to chase (MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group)
>
>
> Hi Felix, all,
>
> Seems ok for me, but wouldn't it be clearer to explicitly say that inheritance takes precedence over default values, I'm saying this because more than once programmers asked me the same question.
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to implement the resolution for issue-70, see my overdue
> action item. But I failed in finding the correct text, since there
> was a thread on this after the f2f, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb
> /
> 0247.html
>
> What is the latest thinking on this?
>
> As a proposal I have made changes to the sections 5.5 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#selection-precedence
> and 6.4http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#html5-selection-preceden
> c
> e
>
> This would close issue-70.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 04.02.13 13:05, schrieb MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker:
>
>  ACTION-437: Make edit for for issue-70, seehttp://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item05 , and go
> back to chase (MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group)
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/437
>
> On: Felix Sasaki
> Due: 2013-02-11
>
> If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, please update your settings at:http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/users/37415
> #
> s
> ettings
>
>
>
>
>
>