- From: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:48:04 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
I added a new use case http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTTPURIUseCases#N.29_Reconciling_incompatible_uses_.28polysemy.29 to the use case list and to the matrix http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTTPURIUseCaseMatrix Thanks to Larry Masinter for this one. I have no doubt distorted the use case description in trying to make it fit in with the comparison framework, so he is not to blame for any deficiencies in what is written. Also the way I have filled in the matrix is somewhat arbitrary, and I welcome arguments for changing its matrix entries. Also: I think that there are possible issues, probably related to type analysis or other kinds of inferences, with the 'punning' approaches (for which I have not yet received a definite proposal) that are not called out by any use case. I welcome use cases that would call out any such difficulties, in anticipation of the reception of a 'punning' proposal. Sorry for the radio silence. The issue is getting quite a bit of attention behind the scenes and we hope to have something to say about it soon. Best Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 00:48:33 UTC