I am aware there are differences. I used the word perceived deliberately. There are very specific design flaws in web browsers, but in the examples cited to me in this case, its not clear cut. So I used the word percieved. It is not On 01/09/2014 8:35 AM, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Andrew Cunningham scripsit: > > > Essentially the problem was web browsers were precieved to have problems > > with displaying content in the languages in question. > > Were *perceived* to have problems, or *actually did* have problems? TO the > users there may be no difference, but to the browser makers, not to mention > the Unicode Consortium, there definitely is. > > -- > John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org > Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child could understand this report. > Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail > out of it. --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports >
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2014 23:09:13 UTC