Re: Open UCR issues for the coverage subgroup ISSUE-18, ISSUE-19, ISSUE-32

Yes, I am OK with that.

Thanks,
Frans



2016-06-06 13:43 GMT+02:00 Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>:

> These 2 topics  (ISSUE-18 and ISSUE-19) came up at the Coverage meeting
> last week. Also, I note that ISSUE-18 refers to a requirement 5.23 Model
> reuse which is also a requirement on the SSN deliverable 9but has not been
> discussed in SSN meetings).
>
>
>
> So… I propose that, instead of using the he “coverage” meeting next week
> we address them at the plenary SDW meeting this week.
>
>
>
> At the same time, I propose we cover ISSUE-32 (see today’s email from
> Frans titled “Merge requirements for non-geographic reference systems?”
> which  refers to both the BP and SSN deliverables, with a relationship to
> Coverage, too.
>
>
>
> Bill, Frans, SSN editors – are you ok with attempting to finalise these
> this week in the plenary?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> –Kerry
>
>
>
> *From:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Sent:* Monday, 6 June 2016 8:20 PM
> *To:* Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
> *Cc:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Open UCR issues for the coverage subgroup
>
>
>
> Hello Bill,
>
>
>
> We still have two open UCR issues that are waiting to be resolved by
> cooperation between the UCR and coverage subgroups. The issues are
> ISSUE-18 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and ISSUE-19
> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19>. Related actions (
> ACTION-114 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/114> and
> ACTION-115 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/115>) were
> assigned to Manolis before the coverage subgroup really started.
>
>
>
> Would it be possible for the coverage subgroup to address these two issues
> in the near future? It would be nice to be able to close them. Perhaps a
> time slot in the next coverage meeting can be found?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>
>
>