Re: UCR isssue: Is provenance in scope?

Thanks Josh,

If we can describe the 'spatialness' of a requirement then it is clear it
is in scope. I think it would help to have examples of aspects of
provenance that are of a spatiotemporal nature and that are not (well)
covered by current solutions like the Provenance Ontology
<http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/>.

Regards,
Frans

2015-05-13 14:38 GMT+02:00 Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>:

> Perhaps we can discuss the general issue of scope today on the call. There
> are many aspects of spatiotemporal data that in general are similar to
> issues with other data, but that clearly require specialization for our
> case. For example, provenance of spatial data must address not only how a
> feature and a spatial reference such as a geometry were formed, but how
> they were associated and under what assumptions for representation of the
> physical world. This is quite specialized to spatial and a significant
> semantic interoperability issue. We will miss addressing critical points in
> our work if we subsume them too often into general ones and deem them out
> of scope.
>
> Josh
>
> Joshua Lieberman, Ph.D.
> Principal
> Tumbling Walls
> jlieberman*tumblingwalls.com
> +1 617 431 6431
>
> On May 13, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have raised an issue for the UCR document: ISSUE-11
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/11>.
> Again, all help in getting this issue resolved is very welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
> --
> Frans Knibbe
> Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> www.geodan.nl
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>
>


-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>