Re: [vibration] issue status summary

Thanks Frederick, that looks correct as far as I remember the discussions.

Regards,

Michael




On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:35 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

> I took action to review status of Vibration API issues in tracker. I've
> updated the ISSUEs, summary is here:
>
> (1) ISSUE-146 : Add vibration strength control ; on [Vibration API]
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/146
>
> Status: Postponed until implementation support, v.next; changed status of
> Issue from Open to Postponed. (all postponed items in tracker mean
> postponed until v.next)
>
> WG resolved  to postpone 3 Oct 2013,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Oct/att-0024/minutes-2013-10-03.html#item04
>
> (2) ISSUE-149 : handling of long vibration list - truncate or no vibration
> at all ; on [Vibration API] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/149
>
> Open - proposed resolution agreed but not incorporated into specification
>
> WG agreed resolution on 10 October 2013,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Oct/att-0128/minutes-2013-10-10.html#item04
>
> RESOLUTION: Adopt proposal as in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Oct/0012.html,
> adding Note that implementation may break into multiple pieces if list too
> long , potential concern if best effort does not meet application
> expectations
>
> Did not update spec asking for implementer feedback -
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Oct/0112.html
>
> Did not receive any additional information, suggest we now update spec as
> proposed, to close issue
>
> (3) ISSUE-150 : Should vibration be additive when multiple instances, e.g.
> iframes ; on [Vibration API] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/150
>
> Status: resolved, closed.
>
> Resolved,  10 October 2013,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Oct/att-0128/minutes-2013-10-10.html#item04
>
> RESOLUTION: Adopt proposal associated with ACTION-652:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Oct/0003.html
>
> Implemented in editors draft but not in CR draft (it seems the limitation
> to browsing context may require a new LC?)
>
> CR draft out of sync with editors draft.
>
> (4) ISSUE-156 : add the [Clamp] attribute to the argument of the vibrate
> method ; on [Vibration API] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/156
>
> Status: Postponed until stable WebIDL specification with agreed [Clamp]
> attribute is available. ; changed status of Issue from Open to Postponed.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Nov/0001.html
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
> For Tracker, this should complete ACTION-672
>
>
>
>