- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:38:33 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:42:37 UTC
Ok, I've just seen that Stian answered a better detailed response some hours ago... 2012/2/7 Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> > Hi Tim, > this is an interesting question. Right now wasGeneratedBy is functional, > so you can assert those 2 assertions, > but it would be inconsistent. However this could bring up problems when > nesting activities, as in a workflow domain > (but that's another issue, so I'll leave it out of this thread). > > Daniel > > > 2012/2/6 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > >> PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/242 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> Is the following valid? >> >> wasGeneratedBy(e,,2001-10-26T21:32:52) >> wasGeneratedBy(e,,2011-11-27T21:23:34) >> >> If no, where does DM say so? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:42:37 UTC