- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:14:28 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:15:01 UTC
Hi Tim, I think this issue has already been addressed: wasDerivedFrom is a subproperty of tracedTo. Can it be closed? Thanks, Daniel 2011/10/20 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > I was just wondering if this decision needs to be made now? > > Can we not just get all the data model concepts reflected in the ontology? > > We can then add more sophisticated constraints later. For example, the > data model as I read it does not have any hierarchy of derivation > properties. > > cheers, > Paul > > Satya Sahoo wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Comments are interleaved. >> >> However - dependedOn is transitive - but wasDerivedFrom is >> not. Can >> you be a subproperty and loose the transitivity? >> >> >> (Did anyone else answer this?) >> >> Yes, I think so. >> >> I agree. >> >> The current ProvenanceOntology.owl models wasDerivedFrom as subPropertyOf >> dependedOn (also discussed in Issue-125). In addition, >> wasEventuallyDerivedFrom is modeled as a subPropertyOf wasDerivedFrom. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best, >> Satya >> > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:15:01 UTC