Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)

+1. It makes sense to me.
Daniel

2011/11/7 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

>
> Dear all,
>
> Again, in the interest of simplification, we would like to make the
> following proposal.
> Can you express your support for the proposal, or if you have issue with
> it, explain what
> the concern is.
>
> Thanks,
> Luc
>
>
> Context:
> Attribute-value pairs are introduced to provide characterizations of
> entities and activities.
> Name-value pairs are used to for qualifiers for use/generation/etc
>
> Proposal: Use a single notion of attribute-value pairs to characterize
> entities, activities, use
>  and generation. As a result, drop the notion of qualifier and its
> associated production.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
> PS. A consequence of this, is that we will use a uniform syntax for
> attributes in entities and
>  uses/generation, and hence, hopefully address Graham's ISSUE-140
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/issues/140<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/140>
>
>