- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:34:50 +0200
- To: Shwetank Dixit <shwetankd@opera.com>
- Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Shwetank Dixit <shwetankd@opera.com> wrote: > To add to the point, someone can make an app using gUM without even > involving any other part of WebRTC (like peerconnection or datachannels) ... > so, a gUM app doesn't always have to be about *communication*. Considering > such cases, I think it's fair to allow it to be using http. Given that operators are not afraid of injecting content into HTTP, what would stop such an injection from sharing data made available from getUserMedia()? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 11:35:19 UTC