- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:25:12 +0200
- To: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Jay Myers <jay.myers@bestbuy.com>
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com> wrote: > There are several tutorials/articles that introduced @src usage in > RDFa 1.0, e.g. This is important to consider. However, I think the situation is mitigated by the fact that hanging rels pick up both @about and @href/@resource. Hence even if @src is changed in RDFa 1.1 to behave like the latter, any code using a hanging rel to link to the image will still work. This is not the case with "@src @rel @href" triples nor "@src @property @content" ones though, so any examples of that being used in the wild would be very relevant to this issue. > http://www.heppresearch.com/gr4google This particular example uses only hanging rel, so it should work even with the change. > http://www.slideshare.net/dunken69/rd-fa-everywhere (#8) Uses at least a @resource @rev @src triple (#8) – i.e. it would break with the change. > http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/2609/how-to-accommodate-conneg-variants-in-rdfa Uses a hanging rev, should work. (But it uses span/@src, so it seems a bit broken? Granted, the edit recommends a/@href instead.) Best regards, Niklas
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:26:01 UTC