Re: Suggested resolution of Issue 849: Specify an AllowUnverifiedMedia RTCConfiguration property

Cullen,

Until we see the scenario where unverified media can be received by a full
ICE end point which implements consent to send, there is general consensus
that unverified media to WebRTC endpoint cannot happen.

Regards,

_____________
Roman Shpount

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com
> wrote:

>
> I did explain the issue where this can happen in the PR. There may not be
> agreement that the case can not happen but there is also not agreement that
> it can not. So until someone explains to my why this can not happen, I
> think it should remain open. I'm not really following the mmusic
> conversation and have no idea why they are sending a liaison like that.
>
>
> > On Apr 25, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > At the March 1, 2017 virtual interim, the WEBRTC WG discussed Issue 849
> and PR 1026 and Peter and Cullen were given the task of producing “more
> exact info on the offers and answers”: https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-
> webrtc-minutes
> >
> > Since then, we have had considerable discussion on Github relating to PR
> 1026 , as well as related discussion on the IETF MMUSIC WG mailing list and
> at the IETF 98 MMUSIC WG meeting.
> >
> > Over time, the focus of the discussion has narrowed to whether it is
> possible for unverified media to arise within the WebRTC 1.0 API.
> >
> > The MMUSIC WG is now in the process of drafting a response to the W3C
> WEBRTC WG liaison statement :
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/TcyynbwyBsmJhE9eLac-gt33wtQ
> >
> > In this draft liaison response, the IETF MMUSIC WG indicates that they
> “would like to request a clarification of the exact sequence of events that
> WEBRTC believes can lead to this.  In particular, we ask you to please show
> either
> >
> >       • How ICE can complete prior to DTLS fingerprint exchange, or
> >       • How media can be received prior to ICE completing”
> >
> > Looking over the discussion of PR 1026 , multiple scenarios are
> investigated, but in the end, it appears that in each scenario the above
> conditions cannot be met.
> >
> > Given the extensive discussion that has taken place, and the inability
> to come up with a sequence of events, I would like to propose that we close
> Issue 849.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
>