Re: Issue 252.

When I filed Issue 252 I read the "non-" as a typo, due to the language
"one of two" manners. That is, I read it as having intended to say mutual
exclusivity applied. However, you obviously didn't read it that way it
seems. I don't actually have any reason to prohibit the simultaneous use of
both metadata attributes and metadata content child elements. So if others
are ok with "both", then I will restore the original language but with some
improvements to make it clear that both can be used together.


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  In issue 252 you have gone (by my reading) from a non-mutually exclusive
> system,  viz : “one of two (non-mutually exclusive) manners”****
>
> So <metadata ttm:foo ><ttm:xxx>…</ttm:x></metadata> ****
>
> ** **
>
> was legal, and now isnt. Why have you removed the ‘non’? This seems like
> a breaking change with no motivation. I’m not sure why you want to enforce
> exclusivity, especially given the schemas aren’t up to doing so?****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> *Sent:* 19 June 2013 10:23
> *To:* public-tt
> *Subject:* Re: TTML 1.0 Issues - Newly Moved to Pending Review****
>
> ** **
>
> Also moving to pending review (just fixed):****
>
> ** **
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/221****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:****
>
> Also moving to pending review (just fixed);****
>
> ** **
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/222****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:****
>
> Also moved to pending review, fixed previously (May 26)****
>
> ** **
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/216****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:****
>
> I've now moved the following to pending review status:****
>
> ** **
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/218****
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/219****
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/220****
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/223****
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/251****
>
> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/252****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>