Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> > You over-generalize when you
> > imply that one such restrictive license effectively prohibits a
> meaningful
> > use of a mechanism with a non-restrictive policy.
>
> What would be a meaningful use of the proposed mechanism with a
> non-restrictive policy? (HTML5 video already supports cases where the
> user is not treated as an adversary.)
>

adversary? customers aren't usually viewed as adversaries... let's tone
done the hyperbole please